Mapscape vs
Polished mapping-first arborist tool. Strong on the cartographic side; weaker on field-capture ergonomics and report drafting.
The honest comparison.
| Capability | Mapscape | tree·canopy |
|---|---|---|
| Voice-first capture in the field | — | |
| AI-drafted report | — | |
| Native mobile + browser | — | |
| If the signal drops | ||
| Transparent public pricing | — | |
| Your local tree survey standard | ||
| Species ID built-in | — | |
| Pest & disease ID built-in | — | |
| Constraints plan overlay | ||
| GIS export (Shapefile / GeoJSON) | ||
| Self-service trial | — | |
| EU data residency |
Where Mapscape is strong — and where we fit.
Mapscape produces some of the best-looking deliverables in the category. The map output, the constraints plan, the cartographic polish — all genuinely strong. If your client expects a beautiful figure on the planning application, Mapscape has been a safe choice.
The trade-off is the workflow leading up to that figure. Capture is still form-and-stylus. There's no voice layer, no AI-drafted narrative, no self-service trial. You have to talk to sales to get a quote.
The same constraints-plan overlay your clients expect, with voice capture in front of it and an AI-drafted narrative behind it. Published pricing, self-service trial, no sales call to find out the number.
Transparent. Flat prices.
Your crew is free on every plan. One flat price for one office seat, one for five. Direct contract for Enterprise.
Solo
$24.99
For one person in the office. Your crew is free.
Practice Crew
$129.99
For more than one person in the office. One flat price, five office seats.
Enterprise
$1,199
For councils, larger firms, and anyone past five office seats.
tree·canopy
Your next site should be on this.
14-day free trial. No card. Download and start on Monday.
Or — talk to us about Enterprise → hello@treecanopy.app