TreeLogger.ai vs
Modern web + mobile tree inventory tool. Markets itself as AI-assisted but the AI is largely a chat layer over the same form-based capture.
The honest comparison.
| Capability | TreeLogger.ai | tree·canopy |
|---|---|---|
| Voice-first capture in the field | — | |
| AI-drafted report | — | |
| Native mobile + browser | ||
| Offline-first | ||
| Transparent public pricing | — | |
| Your local tree survey standard | ||
| Species ID built-in | — | |
| Pest & disease ID built-in | — | |
| Constraints plan overlay | — | |
| GIS export (Shapefile / GeoJSON) | ||
| Self-service trial | ||
| EU data residency |
Where TreeLogger.ai is strong — and where we fit.
TreeLogger.ai is one of the newer entrants and the closest thing to a contemporary stack. The interface is clean, the mobile experience is solid, and you can spin up a trial without a sales call.
Where it stops short: the 'AI' label is mostly an assistant chatbot. The capture flow is still form fields and finger taps; the report is still mostly typed. The wedge — talking the inspection and getting back a drafted report — isn't there.
Voice as the primary input, not a chat assistant. The form fills itself while you walk. The report comes back two-thirds drafted, not as a chat transcript.
Transparent. Per seat.
One price for sole traders. Per-seat for small practices. Direct contract for Enterprise.
Solo
$35
For sole-trader consultants.
Practice
$39
For 2–25 person consultancies. Shared review, team workspace.
Enterprise
$1,199
For councils, large consultancies, and council in-house teams.
tree·canopy
Your next site should be on this.
14-day free trial. No card. Download and start on Monday.
Or — talk to us about Enterprise → hello@treecanopy.app